Posts Tagged ‘David Goldman’

On CNN’s “Larry King Live” Wednesday, David Goldman responded to Brazilian Judge Marco Aurelio decision to not return his abducted son, Sean, from Brazil with a simple statement.

“They’re sending this message that anyone can take any child from anywhere, come to Brazil and if they can hide enough or stall enough or keep the child here long enough then they’re entitled to that child? That’s unacceptable.”

According to the 2008 Compliance Report for the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, these countries have demonstrated patterns of noncompliance with the Hague Treaty.

  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Chile
  • Ecuador
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Mexico
  • Poland
  • Venezuela
  • Brazil acceded to the Convention on 10-19-1999. It entered into force with U.S. 12-1-2003 but continues to have a pattern of noncompliance due to Judicial Performance.

    Brazil continued to demonstrate patterns of noncompliance with the Convention in its judicial performance. The USCA notes several instances during FY 2007 in which Brazilian courts treated Convention cases as custody decisions, rather than applying the principles of wrongful removal or retention laid out in the Convention. In two cases, Brazilian judges refused returns to the United States, citing the “best interests of the child.” These decisions contradict the Convention, as the Preamble of the Convention declares that the interest of children is attained through their return to their country of habitual residence.

    In addition, the USCA notes that judges in some cases continued to demonstrate a bias towards mothers and towards Brazilian citizens. Further, the judicial process is excessively lengthy, with cases going on well beyond the six weeks mandated by the Convention. The appeals process adds many months—and sometimes more—to Convention cases. For cases to proceed more quickly, the USCA finds that parents filing the application for return of their child need to hire a private attorney with experience handling Convention cases. The Brazilian Central Authority is attempting to limit the number of judges who have authority to hear Convention cases. Additionally, a number of judges participated in a judicial seminar in December 2006, which was sponsored by the Hague Permanent Bureau and attended by a representative of the USCA.

    Update 06-09-09: Help pass House Resolution 125

    H.Res.125: Calling on Brazil in accordance with its obligations under the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction to obtain, as a matter of extreme urgency, the return of Sean Goldman to his father David Goldman in the United States; urging the governments of all countries that are partners with the United States to the Hague Convention to fulfill their obligations to return abducted children to the United States; and recommending that all other nations, including Japan, that have unresolved international child abduction cases join the Hague Convention and establish procedures to promptly and equitably address the tragedy of international child abductions.

    Lawmaker Seeks Brazil Sanctions Over Custody Case
    US congressman presses for sanctions vs. Brazil over custody case involving NJ man, son

    (AP)A U.S. congressman is pushing to suspend certain trade preferences with Brazil until a boy at the center of a custody dispute there is returned to his father in New Jersey.

    New Jersey Republican Chris Smith introduced a bill Thursday that would temporarily remove Brazil from a duty-free trade program. He says Brazil received benefits on $2.75 billion worth of trade last year.

    Smith is a champion for David Goldman, whose wife took their son to Brazil in 2004. She died last year, and the boy has been living with his Brazilian stepfather.

    Update 06-10-09: Brazil court clears an obstacle to boy’s US return

    SAO PAULO (AP) — Brazil’s Supreme Court on Wednesday threw out a bid by a political party to stop a 9-year-old boy from being taken to the United States to live with his father. But the boy’s return to the U.S. is likely to be delayed by further legal appeals.

    In a 10-0 decision, the Supreme Court refused to consider the appeal by a conservative Brazilian party that argued it would be wrong to take Sean Goldman from his stepfather’s custody after five years in the South American country.

    The court ruled that a federal court should decide whether the boy will return to the U.S. or remain with his stepfamily in Brazil.

    Related Posts:

    Fighting for Sean
    Case Type: Hague Case
    Brazilian Federal Court deciding a Hague Case

    Read Full Post »

    David Goldman’s struggle to re-unite with his 9-year-old son Sean today has been put on hold by a Brazilian Judge. The Brazilian Supreme Court will now have to rule on Sean’s fate. Over four years ago David Goldman’s son, Sean, was abducted by his mother to Brazil. David has been fighting an expansive legal battle in the Brazilian courts to bring his son home.

    David’s wife, Bruna, remarried in Brazil and then died last fall giving birth to a new daughter. Bruna’s new husband was then shockingly awarded custody of Sean by a Brazilian court.

    RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil (CNN) — A Brazilian supreme court judge on Tuesday suspended a lower court’s order that would have given custody of a 9-year-old boy to the U.S. consulate in Rio de Janeiro, where he was to be reunited with his American father.

    Judge Marco Aurelio argued against taking Sean Richard Goldman from what has been his home for almost five years to the United States “in an abrupt manner.”

    Doing so, he wrote in his order published on the supreme court’s Web site, could subject the boy to psychological harm.

    The decision, which means the entire Brazilian supreme court will take up the case, comes a day after a superior court justice ordered Sean taken Wednesday to the U.S. consulate in Rio and handed over to his father, David Goldman, who arrived Tuesday from New Jersey to pick up his son.

    Related Posts:

    Fighting for Sean
    Case Type: Hague Case
    Brazilian Federal Court deciding a Hague Case

    Read Full Post »

    Brazilian National Human Rights Secretariat head Paulo Vannuchi says the court shouldn’t give absolute custody to either party. He told a Brazilian congressional hearing Wednesday of last week, the boy should stay in Brazil but the U.S. father should have liberal visitation rights according to this report.

    Last month the U.S. Senate called for Brazil to return Sean to his dad in NJ.  They were strong words but backed with little action.

    The U.S. Embassy posted this statement on their website. 


    Brazil and the United States have an international agreement about how to handle wrongful retention and wrongful abduction of children from their original countries of residence: The Hague Convention of 1980. Both countries are obliged to make sure that this treaty is enforced.

    The U.S. Embassy notes that a case centering on this question is currently before the 16th Federal Court in Rio and we are respectfully awaiting the decision of that court. Brazil has an independent and professional judiciary. This is not a question that should be decided in the press or the court of public opinion.

    The wrongful removal and wrongful retention of children from their homes, and the forced separation of parent and child is unnecessary and cruel. The United States has facilitated the return of seven children to Brazil since The Hague treaty entered into force between our two countries. We call on the office of the Secretary of Human Rights to support the return of all children wrongfully removed and wrongfully retained.

    American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Offers Statement on Goldman Child Custody Case

    CHICAGO, April 28 /PRNewswire/ — The American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML), an organization comprised of the nation’s top 1,600 matrimonial attorneys, has released a statement on the Goldman international child custody case and the need for the country of Brazil to return the boy to his father in the United States:

    “Because the rights and best interests of a child must always take precedence, the AAML believes that Brazil should do everything within its power to return Sean Goldman and uphold the previously agreed to tenets of The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction,” said Gary Nickelson, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. “As one of the signatory countries to Hague, the Brazilian government should never look the other way while a parent takes a child and violates valid court orders and the provisions of this international agreement.”

    Related Post:

    Fighting for Sean

    Homologation and Brazilian Child Custody Law

    Read Full Post »

    Older Posts »